Bhojshala War: In a landmark ruling, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has officially declared the disputed 11th-century Bhojshala complex in Dhar as a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati. A bench comprising Justices Vijay Kumar Shukla and Alok Awasthi set aside a decades-old arrangement that permitted both Hindus and Muslims to offer prayers at the site on designated days.
The court’s decision was heavily informed by a 2,200-page scientific survey conducted by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in 2024, which concluded that the existing structure was constructed using the remains of an earlier Hindu temple. Consequently, the court suggested that the Muslim community seek alternative land for a mosque, ending the long-standing dual-worship protocol at the protected monument.
Major victory for Hindus in the Bhojshala case 👏🏻
The court has ruled that Bhojshala is a temple and authorized the Center to install Murti of Maa SaraswatiReclaim 🔥Reestablish🔥 pic.twitter.com/dsHVNWQIWo
— Sheetal Chopra 🇮🇳 (@SheetalPronamo) May 15, 2026
The Legal Verdict and Constitutional Basis
The court’s findings were guided by the principles established by the Supreme Court in the Ayodhya verdict. By analyzing archaeological data, historical literature, and ASI notifications, the bench determined that the character of the site as a center for Sanskrit learning and Vedic worship had never been fully extinguished.
The Justices emphasized that under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, the state has a duty to preserve the “purity and pristine character” of the deity and provide amenities for pilgrims. The ruling essentially transitions the site from a disputed “protected monument” with shared access to a religious site with exclusive Hindu worship rights.
The Scientific Foundation: The ASI Report
A central pillar of the judgment was the ASI’s scientific survey carried out between March and June 2024. The report provided several key insights:
-
Architectural Reuse: The current structure was built using pillars, stones, and carvings from pre-existing temples.
-
Original Identity: Historical records and physical evidence pointed toward the site being the “Bhojshala,” an 11th-century college and temple established by King Bhoja.
-
Lack of Islamic Features: Proponents for the Hindu side argued that the structure lacked fundamental architectural features traditionally found in mosques built from the ground up during that era.
Arguments and Contentions
Representing the Hindu side, advocates Vishnu Shankar Jain and Vinay Joshi highlighted the 1904 ASI report, which identified the idol of Vagdevi (Saraswati) currently housed in the British Museum as originating from this site. They argued that the historical and religious identity of the complex was indisputably Hindu.
Conversely, the Muslim side, represented by senior advocates Salman Khurshid and Shobha Menon, challenged the ASI’s findings. They raised concerns regarding:
-
Survey Transparency: Allegations were made regarding unclear videography and the exclusion of certain artifacts, such as a Buddha statue allegedly found during the dig.
-
Technical Validity: The defense argued that outdated techniques were used and that “Pran-Pratishtha” (consecration) of an idol had never been proven.
-
Procedural Lapses: Claims were made that the survey team removed raised platforms against specific court directions.
A Shift in Tradition
Since 2003, the Bhojshala complex operated under a compromise: Hindus worshipped on Tuesdays and during the festival of Basant Panchami, while Muslims offered Friday prayers. This ruling effectively dissolves that arrangement. While the Hindu petitioners celebrated the verdict as a restoration of historical justice, the Muslim side expressed deep reservations about the survey’s “bias.”
The decision marks a significant chapter in India’s ongoing legal dialogues regarding historical religious sites, reinforcing the weight of archaeological evidence in determining the “religious character” of disputed monuments.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has recognized the Bhojshala complex as a temple of Goddess Saraswati, ending shared worship rights. Basing its decision on an ASI survey, the court ruled that the site was historically a center of Sanskrit learning.
Also Read: CM announces water conservation drive till June 30; reviews works for Simhastha 2028 in Ujjain
